Distracted-driving citations in Wisconsin turn on subjective observation. What the officer thought they saw versus what actually happened. Wis. Stat. § 346.89 prohibits composing, sending, or reading an electronic message while a vehicle is in motion, and separately bars any activity that reasonably interferes with safe driving. Both elements are fact-specific, and both are defensible.
Why observation-based tickets are defensible
Officers typically write these tickets based on a glance. Downward-angled eyes, a hand near a mounted phone, a delayed reaction at a light. The statute requires the activity to reasonably appear to interfere with safe driving, which is a fact question rather than a bright-line rule. Cross-examination of the officer and recovery of phone-carrier records routinely undercut the observation.
Preserving your phone’s activity log (screenshots of messages, call history, and app-usage data in a five-minute window around the stop) is the single most important step a driver can take. Carrier records rotate off after 30-90 days; once gone, they’re gone.
What Wisconsin law actually prohibits
Wisconsin has no general hand-held ban on phone use by adults. Unlike Illinois, Minnesota, or Michigan. Adult drivers are permitted to use hands-free calls and mounted navigation or music outside work zones. In work zones, Wis. Stat. § 346.89(4) bans all hand-held phone use regardless of purpose, and fines double under § 346.57(5)(f).
The offense carries 4 demerit points and can create insurance consequences that depend on the carrier, policy, driving history, and final conviction. For probationary-license drivers (first two years or under 18), the lower point-suspension threshold means a single distracted-driving conviction stacked with another moving violation can put the license at risk.
How we fight these citations
Our approach: pin down the officer’s actual vantage point, recover your phone-carrier log before it rotates, contest the in-motion and electronic message statutory elements, and negotiate reductions to inattentive driving (§ 346.89(1)) or a non-moving ordinance violation when the record supports it.
In most Racine, Kenosha, and Walworth County cases we appear in court for you. Our goal is always the same. Preserve your driving record and your insurance rate, not just reduce the one-time fine.
Should you talk to a lawyer before paying this ticket?
Usually, yes. Paying the ticket closes the case as a guilty plea. Before that happens, we can check whether the ticket can be reduced, amended, or fought in a way that protects points, insurance, license status, and court appearances.
- The citation carries points or could push you near 12 points in 12 months.
- You drive for work, hold a CDL, or need a clean driving record.
- You want to prevent a moving violation from raising insurance premiums.
What a texting & driving conviction costs in Wisconsin
- Demerit points
- 4 Under Wis. Admin. Code Trans 101; stacked with other stop citations can approach suspension threshold quickly
- Fine + surcharge
- $20 - $40 base · $173 total Higher for repeat offenses; doubled in work and school zones (Wis. Stat. § 346.89(4))
- Insurance increase
- Carrier-specific; depends on policy and record Carrier-specific; depends on policy and record
- Probationary license
- 6-point suspension First two years of licensure or under 18, a single distracted-driving conviction plus any other moving violation can cost the license
- CDL impact
- Serious violation Hand-held phone use in a CMV is a federal violation (49 CFR § 392.82); 2 serious violations in 3 years = 60-day DQ
- Record duration
- 5 years Wis. Admin. Code Trans 101; conviction remains visible to insurers and employers beyond point decay
Our texting & driving defense playbook
Preserve phone-carrier and device records
The first step on any distracted-driving case is preserving your phone-carrier log, app-usage history, and device screenshots for a five-minute window around the stop. Carrier records rotate off in 30-90 days. Losing them before we subpoena them is the most common irreversible error.
Challenge the officer's vantage and observation
Officers typically cite from a glance. Head angle, hand position, eyes down. We map the officer's actual vantage point against your vehicle's geometry, cross-check dashcam and bodycam against the ticket narrative, and surface discrepancies that defeat the observation-based element.
Contest the statutory elements
§ 346.89 requires the device use to constitute an electronic message and the vehicle to be in motion. Mounted navigation, hands-free calls, and music selection have been successfully argued as outside the statute, as has phone use while stopped at a red light where dashcam confirms the vehicle was stationary.
Negotiate to inattentive driving or non-moving
Because the observation element is subjective, prosecutors in Racine, Kenosha, and Walworth County routinely accept reductions to inattentive driving (§ 346.89(1), lower points) or a non-moving ordinance violation (zero points, no MVR entry). A non-moving reduction is the cleanest outcome short of dismissal.
Protect the probationary license
For drivers in their first two years or under 18, the 6-point suspension threshold makes any reduction that carries points dangerous when stacked with other citations. We build the plea around points management, not just the fine, because losing the probationary license is a much bigger problem than the ticket itself.
Racine, Kenosha & Walworth county courts
Distracted-driving citations are civil forfeitures, so your case is heard in the court of the citing jurisdiction (typically a municipal court (for city or village police stops) or a county circuit court (for sheriff or Wisconsin State Patrol citations).
Our attorneys appear regularly in Racine County Circuit Court (730 Wisconsin Ave., Racine), Kenosha County Courthouse (912 56th Street, Kenosha), Walworth County Judicial Center (1800 County Road NN, Elkhorn), and the municipal courts of Racine, Mt. Pleasant, Caledonia, Sturtevant, Kenosha, Pleasant Prairie, Lake Geneva, Delavan, Burlington, Union Grove, and surrounding jurisdictions. In the overwhelming majority of these cases you do not have to appear) we enter a not-guilty plea on your behalf at the first court date, set the matter for trial, and handle every subsequent appearance.
Traffic-ticket outcomes depend on what we can protect
For texting & driving cases, the defense target is usually one of four things: points, insurance premiums, license status, or a criminal/CDL consequence hidden behind the citation.
See the traffic-ticket case-results hub for anonymized examples and related service links. Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome on any individual case.
The municipal-court judges who hear most texting & driving cases
Most ordinance-level traffic citations are heard at the municipal-court level, not circuit court. Below are the currently sitting municipal court judges across our 3-county service area, verified against each municipality's own court page or the county's official roster. The list omits 3 municipalities (Caledonia, Whitewater, Sturtevant) where we are still re-verifying the current judge by phone before publishing.
Racine County municipal courts
- City of Racine Hon. Rob Weber Official City notice identifies Judge Rob Weber as the sole municipal-judge candidate for the April 2026 election. verify source →
- Village of Mount Pleasant Hon. Michael R. Phegley verify source →
- City of Burlington Hon. Kelly Iselin City staff directory lists Kelly Iselin as Municipal Court Judge. verify source →
- Village of Union Grove Hon. Scott Kasprowicz Term 2025-2027 (special election after Judge Reichert retired Dec 2024). verify source →
- Village of Waterford Hon. Robert J. Jones Village court; the Town of Waterford has a separate court with a different judge. verify source →
Kenosha County municipal courts
- City of Kenosha Hon. Michael M. Easton City Municipal Court records form lists Judge Michael Easton and the court contact information. verify source →
- Village of Pleasant Prairie Hon. Richard "Dick" Ginkowski Village court page lists Richard Alan Ginkowski as Municipal Judge. verify source →
- Village of Twin Lakes Hon. Bruce Goodnough Shared court covering Village of Twin Lakes + Town of Randall Serving since 1989. verify source →
- Village of Salem Lakes Hon. Patrick Dunn verify source →
Walworth County municipal courts
- City of Lake Geneva Hon. Henry A. Sibbing Term May 2023 - May 2027. verify source →
- City of Elkhorn Hon. Lori Domino Term ends April 2027. verify source →
- City of Delavan Hon. Michael Rhyner City court; Town of Delavan has a separate court with Judge Edward F. Thompson. verify source →
- Village of Fontana Hon. Thomas E. Sullivan verify source →
Who hears texting & driving cases in our service area
Texting & Driving cases prosecuted at the criminal level (not municipal-court ordinance) are heard at the county circuit court level. Below are the currently sitting circuit court judges and elected District Attorneys for each of the three counties we serve. Source metadata now feeds a monthly re-check so the roster on this page stays accurate without adding duplicate date stamps.
Racine County
District Attorney: Tricia Hanson DA source →
Sitting circuit court judges (9):
- Hon. Wynne P. Laufenberg · Branch 1 · Chief Judge
- Hon. Eugene A. Gasiorkiewicz · Branch 2
- Hon. Jessica E.H. Lynott · Branch 3
- Hon. Scott P. Craig · Branch 4
- Hon. David W. Paulson · Branch 6
- Hon. Jamie M. McClendon · Branch 7
- Hon. Faye M. Flancher · Branch 8
- Hon. Robert S. Repischak · Branch 9
- Hon. Timothy D. Boyle · Branch 10
Kenosha County
District Attorney: Xavier Solis DA source →
Sitting circuit court judges (8):
- Hon. Gerad T. Dougvillo · Branch 1
- Hon. Jason A. Rossell · Branch 2
- Hon. Heather Iverson · Branch 3
- Hon. David O. Hughes · Branch 4
- Hon. David P. Wilk · Branch 5
- Hon. Angelina Gabriele · Branch 6
- Hon. Jodi L. Meier · Branch 7
- Hon. Chad G. Kerkman · Branch 8
Walworth County
District Attorney: Zeke Wiedenfeld DA source →
Sitting circuit court judges (4):
- Hon. Estee E. Scholtz · Branch 1
- Hon. Daniel S. Johnson · Branch 2
- Hon. Kristine E. Drettwan · Branch 3
- Hon. Samuel T. Berg · Branch 4
Texting & Driving enforcement and traffic-stop volume by county
Verified statistics from official Wisconsin and county sources.